Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0286398, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238504

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People experienced various stress and psychological responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to examine the changes in emergency medical services (EMSs) utilization by self-harm patients in early pandemic and the impacts of physical distancing measures on the EMSs utilization by self-harm patients. METHODS: Data for all patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) after self-harm injuries including self-poisoning were collected from the National ED Information System (NEDIS). Characteristics of patients in two study regions (urban versus rural) were compared. Weekly and annual ED visit rates after self-harm (VRSH) per 100,000 population were calculated. Mobile phone mobility index (MPMI) was calculated by dividing a region's aggregated mobile phone mobility by mid-year population. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to assess changes in 2020 over pre-pandemic years. Test for presence of joinpoint at the end of 2019 was performed. A cross-correlation function was used to estimate the maximal morphological similarity and lag time between changes in MPMI and VRSH. RESULTS: In 2020, in early phases of the pandemic, there was a moderate decline in self-harm-related ED visits to 30,797 from a continuously increasing trend seen in previous years. However, proportions of young people (50.1%) and females (62.3%) increased over previous years. VRSHs among women and young people aged 15-34 years showed higher levels in 2020 than in previous five years. There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients transported directly from the scene. In addition, there was a polarization of mental state upon ED arrival from alert and unresponsive. The median correlation coefficient between MPMI values and VRSH values was 0.601 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.539-0.619) in urban regions and 0.531 (IQR: 0.454-0.595) in rural regions, showing no statistically significant difference between the two. CONCLUSION: Physical distancing measures adopted to prevent the spread of transmittable diseases following the pandemic had the effect of decreasing ED visits due to self-harm. When the pandemic has ended, and daily life has been restored, it will be particularly important to pay attention to the increased numbers of self-harm patients expected to visit EDs compared to during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Pandemics , Physical Distancing , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/prevention & control , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
2.
J Affect Disord ; 331: 393-404, 2023 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nurses have been identified as an occupational group at increased risk of suicide. This systematic review examines the prevalence of, and factors influencing, suicide and related behaviours among nurses and midwives (PROSPERO pre-registration CRD42021270297). METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched. Articles published from 1996 onwards exploring suicidal thoughts and behaviours among nurses and midwives were included. Quality of included studies was assessed. Articles were subjected to narrative synthesis informed by suicide data examined, study design, and quality. PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS: A total of 100 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Articles examining suicide exclusively among midwives were absent from the literature. Several studies confirmed that nursing professionals, especially female, are at increased risk of suicide, particularly by self-poisoning. Factors contributing to risk include psychiatric disorders, alcohol and substance misuse, physical health problems, and occupational and interpersonal difficulties. In studies of non-fatal suicidal behaviours, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, psychiatric, psychological, physical and occupational factors were contributory. There has been little investigation of interventions for prevention of suicide in nurses. LIMITATIONS: Only articles published in English language were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the risk of suicide in nurses. They also show a combination of factors contribute to suicide and non-fatal suicidal behaviour in nurses, with psychiatric, psychological, physical health, occupational and substance misuse (especially alcohol) problems being particularly important. The limited evidence regarding prevention measures indicates a major need to develop primary and secondary interventions for this at-risk occupational group, for example, education regarding enhancing wellbeing and safe alcohol use, alongside accessible psychological support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Midwifery , Self-Injurious Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Suicidal Ideation , Prevalence , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
3.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 10(5): 342-351, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus about the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children and adolescents. We aimed to compare rates of paediatric emergency department visits for attempted suicide, self-harm, and suicidal ideation during the pandemic with those before the pandemic. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO for studies published between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 19, 2022. Studies published in English with data on paediatric (ie, those aged <19 years) emergency department visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Case studies and qualitative analyses were excluded. Changes in attempted suicide, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and other mental-illness indicators (eg, anxiety, depression, and psychosis) were expressed as ratios of the rates of emergency department visits during the pandemic compared with those before the pandemic, and we analysed these with a random-effects meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022341897. FINDINGS: 10 360 non-duplicate records were retrieved, which yielded 42 relevant studies (with 130 sample-estimates) representing 11·1 million emergency department visits for all indications of children and adolescents across 18 countries. The mean age of the samples of children and adolescents across studies was 11·7 years (SD 3·1, range 5·5-16·3), and there were on average 57·6% girls and 43·4% boys as a proportion of emergency department visits for any health reasons (ie, physical and mental). Only one study had data related to race or ethnicity. There was good evidence of an increase in emergency department visits for attempted suicide during the pandemic (rate ratio 1·22, 90% CI 1·08-1·37), modest evidence of an increase in emergency department visits for suicidal ideation (1·08, 0·93-1·25), and good evidence for only a slight change in self-harm (0·96, 0·89-1·04). Rates of emergency department visits for other mental-illness indications showed very good evidence of a decline (0·81, 0·74-0·89), and paediatric visits for all health indications showed strong evidence of a reduction (0·68, 0·62-0·75). When rates for attempted suicide and suicidal ideation were combined as a single measure, there was good evidence of an increase in emergency department visits among girls (1·39, 1·04-1·88) and only modest evidence of an increase among boys (1·06, 0·92-1·24). Self-harm among older children (mean age 16·3 years, range 13·0-16·3) showed good evidence of an increase (1·18, 1·00-1·39), but among younger children (mean age 9·0 years, range 5·5-12·0) there was modest evidence of a decrease (0·85, 0·70-1·05). INTERPRETATION: The integration of mental health support within community health and the education system-including promotion, prevention, early intervention, and treatment-is urgently needed to increase the reach of mental health support that can mitigate child and adolescent mental distress. In future pandemics, increased resourcing in some emergency department settings would help to address their expected increase in visits for acute mental distress among children and adolescents. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Male , Female , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Emergency Service, Hospital
4.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1129123, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2269384

ABSTRACT

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about child and adolescent mental health issues, such as self-harm. The impact of society-wide isolation on self-harming behaviors among adolescents in China is unclear. In addition, adolescents of different ages and sexes have varying abilities to cope with environmental changes. However, these differences are rarely considered in self-harm studies. We aimed to characterize the age- and sex-dependent effects of COVID-19-related society-wide isolation on self-harm among adolescents in East China. Methods: We collected 63,877 medical records of children and adolescents aged 8-18 who had an initial visit to Shanghai Mental Health Center in China between 2017 and 2021 and charted annual self-harm rates for each age and sex. Using interrupted time series analysis, we modeled global and seasonal trends and the effect of COVID-19-related society-wide isolation on self-harm rates. Results: Females aged 10-17 and males aged 13-16 exhibited significantly increasing trends in self-harm rate (p fdr < 0.05) in the past 5 years. Eleven-year-old females in 2020 showed a self-harm rate (37.30%) that exceeded the peak among all ages in 2019 (age 13, 36.38%). The COVID-19-related society-wide isolation elevated self-harm rates in female patients aged 12 [RR 1.45 (95% CI 1.19-1.77); p fdr = 0.0031] and 13 years [RR 1.33 (95% CI 1.15-1.5); p fdr = 0.0031], while males were less affected. Further, females with emotional disorders dominated the increased self-harm rates. Conclusion: Society-wide isolation has had a significant impact on early adolescent females in East China, especially for those with emotional disturbances, and has brought forward the peak in adolescent self-harm rates. This study calls for attention to the risk of self-harm in early adolescents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Male , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Female , Mental Health , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
5.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 151: 106056, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescence is thought to stem from interactions between vulnerability in developing biological systems and experience of stressors. The current study assesses whether multiple levels of the stress system's response to threat could prospectively predict NSSI engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic, a shared, time-locked stressor. METHODS: Participants were 64 female adolescents (ages 12-16) from community and clinical settings who were oversampled for NSSI histories. Prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents completed a protocol that measured hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to a social stressor (via salivary cortisol), amygdala volume, amygdala emotion-evoked activation, and frontolimbic resting-state functional connectivity. During early months of the pandemic (Summer 2020), measures of NSSI behavior (Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury), emotion regulation difficulties (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), and pandemic-related stressors (Epidemic Pandemic Impacts Inventory) were collected. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess if pre-pandemic biomarkers predicted mid-pandemic NSSI engagement: persistence of NSSI (Persist; N = 21), cessation of NSSI (Desist; N = 26), and no history of NSSI (Never; N = 17). Linear regressions explored if pre-pandemic biomarkers predicted mid-pandemic difficulties in emotion regulation and perceived stress. RESULTS: Higher pre-pandemic overall cortisol response to stress and amygdala emotion-evoked activation characterized adolescents who persisted in NSSI, compared to those who desisted. These findings remained significant when controlling for pandemic related stressors. Lower prepandemic cortisol reactivity predicted more difficulties in emotion regulation during the pandemic. This finding did not remain significant after controlling for pandemic related stressors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that patterns in key biological threat response systems may confer vulnerability for risk outcomes including NSSI engagement in adolescent females in the context of a shared, novel, naturally-occurring stressor. The results point to the importance of multi-level, longitudinal approaches for understanding the interface between developing neurobiological systems and experiential stress in at-risk adolescents. Identified patterns give insight into potential risk assessment strategies based on an understanding of the multi-level threat response.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emotional Regulation , Self-Injurious Behavior , Humans , Adolescent , Female , Child , Pandemics , Hydrocortisone , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Pituitary-Adrenal System , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
6.
Nat Hum Behav ; 7(3): 411-419, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2185880

ABSTRACT

An aggravation in mental health during the COVID-19 lockdown has been suggested but the impact on self-injury, suicidality and eating disorders (EDs) are less elucidated. Using linear regression in different data set-ups that is longitudinal (n = 7,579) and repeated cross-sectional data (n = 24,625) from the Danish National Birth Cohort, we compared self-reported self-injury, suicidality and symptoms of EDs from before through different pandemic periods until spring 2021. The longitudinal data indicate a reduction in the proportion of self-injury in men (-3.2% points, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.3%; -2.2%, P < 0.001, d.f. = 2) and women (5.7% points, 95% CI = -6.6%; -4.8%, P < 0.001, d.f. = 2) and of suicide ideation in men (-3.0% points, 95% CI = -4.6%; -1.4%, P = 0.002, d.f. = 2) and women (-7.4% points, 95% CI = -8.7%; -6.0%, P < 0.001, d.f. = 2), as well as symptoms of EDs in women (-2.3% points, 95% CI = -3.2%; -1.4%, P < 0.001, d.f. = 2). For suicide attempt, indication of an increase was observed in men only (0.4% points, 95% CI = 0.1%; 0.7%, P = 0.019, d.f. = 2). In the repeated cross-sectional data, we observed no changes in any of the outcomes. Our findings provide no support for the increase in self-injury, suicidality and symptoms of EDs after the lockdowns. Key limitations are differential attrition and varying age in pre- and post-lockdown measures in the longitudinal data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Feeding and Eating Disorders , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide , Male , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Denmark/epidemiology
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 319: 114998, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2150447

ABSTRACT

Individuals with pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses appear to be vulnerable to worsening mental health symptoms during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Furthermore, psychiatric hospitalizations during the pandemic may be complicated by increased risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection and limited social engagement due to changes in hospital policies. The objective of our exploratory study was to determine whether social, economic, and health-related variables were associated with thoughts of suicide and/or self-harm since March 2020 in individuals admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chi-square tests revealed four variables were significantly associated with thoughts of suicide and/or self-harm: 1) difficulty with cancellation of important events, 2) some form of loneliness, 3) decreased time spent in green spaces, and 4) increased time spent using devices with screens. The logistic regression model showed a significant association between suicidal and/or self-harm thoughts and cancellation of important events. Further investigation of the loneliness variable components revealed a significant association between suicidal and/or self-harm thoughts and feeling a lack of companionship, feeling isolated, and feeling alone. These results suggest that social challenges experienced during the pandemic were associated with negative mental health symptoms of individuals admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Humans , Suicidal Ideation , Pandemics , Inpatients , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Hospitalization
8.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 79: 103405, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2149261

ABSTRACT

Descriptive analysis of adolescent mental disorders in Huangshi was performed to explore the gender differences, influencing factors, and abnormal illness behaviors. A total of 674 patients in Huangshi Mental Health Center from 2017 to 2022 were collected. A rising trend of mental disorders has been observed since 2018, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. More young cases led to suicidal attempts and self-harm, which reflects the severity of mental health in adolescents. This study aims to draw the attention of government, society, families, and schools to care about adolescents, which also provides guidance and references for clinical treatment of mental disorders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Self-Injurious Behavior , Humans , Adolescent , Suicidal Ideation , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , China/epidemiology , Risk Factors
9.
Child Adolesc Ment Health ; 27(4): 325-327, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2136725

ABSTRACT

Reducing deaths by suicide in youth is an urgent public health goal and effective treatment approaches remain limited. This editorial reviews new research published in this issue of Child and Adolescent Mental health that may inform youth suicide prevention efforts, including an open trial of a new, family-focused group intervention for youth with suicidal ideation and findings showing that life problems associated with presentation to the emergency department for self-harm vary by age and gender. The need for multi-component treatments that have the flexibility to target a range of life problems/risk factors and to include families in treatment is discussed, along with the need to find a way to make such interventions scalable. Finally, this editorial addresses this issue's debate by discussing the role of mindfulness in dialectical behavior therapy for suicidal youth and the need to carefully monitor and further examine the effectiveness and safety of mindfulness with this patient population.


Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide Prevention , Suicide , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Mental Health , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/prevention & control , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide/psychology
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(37): e30694, 2022 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2077954

ABSTRACT

Although many concerns have been raised on increased self-harm or suicide attempts since the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the numbers of studies reported no consistent increase. This study aimed to analyze the data on the request for emergency medical service (EMS) in Daegu Metropolitan City in Korea to investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and types of suicidal patients. Data of 4480 cases requesting EMS related to self-harm or suicide 1 year before and after the COVID-19 pandemic were retrospectively comparatively analyzed (February 19, 2019-February 18, 2021). The number of EMS requests for self-harm and suicide increased after the pandemic compared to that before the pandemic (daily mean request 5.83 [±2.597] vs 6.43 [±2.918]). In particular, the number of female patients increased per day on average (2.61 [±1.717] vs 3.17 [±1.893]). With respect to the reasons for the request, committed self-harm and attempts to commit self-harm increased, whereas the presumption against suicide decreased. With respect to consciousness levels, the number of alert patients increased, whereas the number of transport cases decreased. For the method of the attempt, hanging and carbon monoxide/gas poisoning decreased, whereas jumping from a height and drowning increased. The number of patients with psychiatric history and those with other chronic illnesses increased. In multivariate regression analysis, women (OR 1.227, 95% CI = 1.072-1.405, P = .003), patients with psychiatric diseases (OR 1.223, 95% CI = 1.031-1.450, P = .021), patients with other chronic illnesses (OR 1.510, 95% CI = 1.127-2.023, P = .006), and CO or gas poisoning (not attempted) (OR 1.349, 95% CI = 1.038-1.753, P = .025) showed statistically significant differences. Among the request for EMS, requests for committed self-harm and attempts to commit suicide increased. Medical support and measures for mental health and emergency medical systems should be established for female patients and patients with psychiatric or other chronic diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gas Poisoning , Self-Injurious Behavior , COVID-19/epidemiology , Carbon Monoxide , Female , Gas Poisoning/epidemiology , Hospitals , Humans , Medical Records , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
11.
Trials ; 23(1): 849, 2022 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Men who present to the emergency department (ED) with self-harm are at high risk of dying by suicide, with 2.7% of men dying in the year following their presentation, more than double the rate for women (1.2%). Despite this, care received after an ED visit is highly variable and many are not assessed for psychological needs. Furthermore, the limited psychological care that is available is often not covered by provincial health insurance. Even when referrals for follow-up care are made, engagement rates are low. Previous recommendations to improve engagement include written discharge plans, caring contacts, and focused interventions targeting middle-aged men at elevated risk of dying by suicide. Blended care, the incorporation of technology into traditional care, has also been proposed as a method to increase engagement in and clinical benefits from psychotherapy. This project aims to determine whether the delivery of an evidence based treatment (problem-solving therapy (PST)) is enhanced by the addition of a custom smartphone application (BEACON) compared to usual care. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site participation and the planned implementation, we have made several changes to the study design, primary outcome, and implementation. METHOD: We originally proposed a cohort study nested within a larger cluster randomized trial wherein intervention sites would deliver the blended care, and control sites, whose personnel were not aware of their participation, would continue delivering usual care. The cohort study evaluated participant level outcomes as previously described by Hatcher et al. (2020). Due to pandemic-related constraints, our number of participating sites dropped to five potential sites which left the cohort study underpowered. As such, we changed the study design to a multi-site, individual randomized controlled trial (RCT) among the five remaining sites. Participants will be randomized to six sessions of therapy (PST) alone, or to the therapy plus BEACON, and followed up for 6 months. Our primary outcome was changed to evaluate feasibility and acceptability with the aim of designing a definitive RCT. Study implementation was reimagined to allow for completely virtual/online conduct to comply with local COVID-19 and institutional restrictions on in-person activities. CONCLUSION: This updated protocol will provide strong results for the planning of a definitive RCT of the blended care intervention in the future, addressing areas of difficulty and concern prior to its implementation. We will evaluate the feasibility of the study intervention, assess recruitment and retention of participants, and address challenges with implementing the protocol. Lastly, we will evaluate the appropriateness of our primary outcome measure and accurately determine a sample size for a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03473535 . Registered on March 22, 2018.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Psychotherapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self-Injurious Behavior/diagnosis , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Smartphone
12.
Psychiatr Danub ; 34(Suppl 8): 140-143, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2045343

ABSTRACT

The sudden and unexpected spread of the COVID 19 pandemic forced the political and health institutions of many countries to adopt drastic measures to contain the contagion, forcing millions of people into isolation and loneliness since 2020. For this reason, health organizations were committed from the beginning to develop all strategies available to support the mental health of the community and to reduce the risks of a rising suicide rate. Although an apparent "protective" role of emergency interventions on suicidal behavior was confirmed during the first months of forced isolation of the population, in the following months a close correlation was highlighted between pandemic period, rising of psychological and psychiatric disorders, and suicidal ideation. The increased suicide rate in Trentino in the first half of 2022 was not unexpected.Beyond the possible increase in suicide rates, a sustained and chronic increase in suicidal risk, suicidal ideation and in self harm could be confirmed in the future. The implementation of successful strategies for reducing suicidal deaths is a public health issue and will lay on the availability of local prevention projects, on their effort to better understand suicide and suicidal behaviors during outbreak, in order to develop the general capacity to early identify risk situation, and to enhance the effectiveness of prevention plans.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide Prevention , Suicide , Depression/psychology , Humans , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide/psychology
13.
J Youth Adolesc ; 51(12): 2383-2395, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2000037

ABSTRACT

For many adolescents, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a uniquely challenging period, and concerns have been raised about whether COVID-19-related stress may increase the risk for self-injurious behaviors among adolescents. This study examined the impact of pre-existing vulnerabilities on the occurrence and frequency of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) through COVID-19-related stress, and whether the impact of COVID-19-related stress on NSSI was buffered by the perceived social support during the pandemic. Participants were 1061 adolescents (52.40% females; Mage = 15.49 years, SD = 0.76) from a two-wave longitudinal study, which included assessments before the COVID-19 onset and one year later the declaration of the pandemic. Path analyses showed that adolescents with a prior history of NSSI, higher levels of internalizing symptoms, and poor regulatory emotional self-efficacy before the COVID-19 pandemic reported higher levels of COVID-19-related stress which in turn increased their risk to engage in NSSI. Besides, the findings did not support the role of social support as a moderator of the association between COVID-19 related stress and the occurrence/frequency of NSSI. These findings suggest that enhanced stress perception may serve as a key pathway for the continuation and development of NSSI among vulnerable adolescents facing adverse life events.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Female , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Longitudinal Studies , Pandemics , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Emotions , Risk Factors
14.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(10)2022 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1875635

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the motives and factors connected to suicidal behavior in 121 hospitalized patients with intentional self-harm (diagnosis X 60-81 according to the ICD-10); (2) Methods: Suicidal behavior of the patient was assessed from data obtained by psychiatric examinations and by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Analysis of data to identify the patients' reason and motives behind suicidal behavior in a group of patients with a suicide attempt (SA, n = 80) and patients with Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior (NSSIB, n = 41) was carried out; (3) Results: Results showed that patients with affective disorder have a 19-times higher rate of SA against other diagnoses. Patients with personality disorders have a 32-times higher rate of NSSIB than patients with other diagnoses. Living alone and the absence of social support increased the likelihood of SA. Qualitative data analysis of patients' statements showed different themes in the justification of motives for suicidal behavior between SA and NSSIB cases. Significant differences were shown for non-communicated reasons, loneliness, social problems, extortion, and distress; (4) Conclusions: The evaluation of patients' verbal statements by qualitative analysis during the psychiatric examination should be considered in clinical practice. It should be considered to include self-poisoning in the criteria of the Non-suicidal Self-Injury diagnostic categories.


Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicidal Ideation , Humans , Motivation , Personality Disorders , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology
15.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266967, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1817487

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Reduced rates of help seeking by those who self-harmed during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported. OBJECTIVES: To understand changes in healthcare service contacts for self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic across primary, emergency and secondary care. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used routine electronic healthcare data for Wales, United Kingdom, from 2016 to March 14, 2021. Population-based data from primary care, emergency departments and hospital admissions were linked at individual-level. All Welsh residents aged ≥10 years over the study period were included in the study. Primary, emergency and secondary care contacts with self-harm at any time between 2016 and March 14, 2021 were identified. Outcomes were counts, incidence, prevalence and proportion of self-harm contacts relative to all contacts in each and all settings, as well as the proportion of people contacting one or more settings with self-harm. Weekly trends were modelled using generalised estimated equations, with differences between 2020 (to March 2021) and comparison years 2016-2018 (to March 2017-2019) quantified using difference in differences, from which mean rate of odds ratios (µROR) across years was reported. RESULTS: The study included 3,552,210 individuals over the study period. Self-harm contacts reduced across services in March and December 2020 compared to previous years. Primary care contacts with self-harm reduced disproportionately compared to non-self-harm contacts (µROR = 0.7, p<0.05), while their proportion increased in emergency departments during April 2020 (µROR = 1.3, p<0.05 in 2/3 comparison years) and hospital admissions during April-May 2020 (µROR = 1.2, p<0.05 in 2/3 comparison years). Despite this, those who self-harmed in April 2020 were more likely to be seen in primary care than other settings compared to previous years (µROR = 1.2, p<0.05). A lower proportion of those with self-harm contacts in emergency departments were subsequently admitted to hospital in December 2020 compared to previous years (µROR = 0.5, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that those who self-harmed during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been less likely to seek help, and those who did so faced more stringent criteria for admission. Communications encouraging those who self-harm to seek help during pandemics may be beneficial. However, this needs to be supported by maintained provision of mental health services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Wales/epidemiology
16.
J Affect Disord ; 309: 193-200, 2022 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1804390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that depressive symptoms, emotional competence, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) may mediate the association between family functioning and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the mediation effects of depressive symptoms, emotional competence, and COVID-related PTSS on the relationship between family functioning and NSSI in adolescents. METHOD: A sample of 5854 adolescents was recruited from June 16 to July 8, 2020. The data for family functioning, depressive symptoms, emotional competence, COVID-related PTSS, and NSSI behavior of adolescents were collected via self-reported questionnaires. A structural equation model was constructed to examine the relationship, and a bootstrap analysis was conducted to evaluate the mediation effects. RESULTS: The reporting rate of adolescent NSSI was 30.2%. The poor family functioning was positively associated with adolescent NSSI (ß = 0.130, 95% CI = 0.093-0.182), which was mediated by depression with effect size of 0.231 (95% CI = 0.201-0.257). The pathway coefficients between emotional competence and NSSI, and depression, COVID-related PTSS and NSSI, though statistically significant were unlikely to be clinically meaning with values of 0.057 and 0.015. There was no mediating effect by COVID-related PTSS. The pathways initially constructed between family functioning and COVID-related PTSS, emotional capacity and COVID-related PTSS were not been verified. LIMITATIONS: It was unclear whether this mediational effect would be supported in a longitudinal design. The application and extension of this model toward other regions and countries, and different ages need to be further explored. CONCLUSION: The interventions of adolescent NSSI should focus on both the family level and individual levels. Improving family environment, screening depressive symptoms, enhancing emotional competence and lessening COVID-related PTSS may reduce NSSI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Emotions , Humans , Latent Class Analysis , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
17.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs ; 29(4): 544-554, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1784706

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: In the initial months of the pandemic, there was no significant increase in demand for mental health services During the pandemic, there was an increase in people reporting an increase in suicidal thoughts. Understanding of the experience of seeking help for self-harm during lockdown is lacking, in terms of availability and accessibility of support services WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: People who self-harm found that their support structures were significantly impacted by lockdown Lockdown presented relational difficulties for people who self-harm WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Learning about the experience of receiving support from mental health liaison services during lockdown from a first-hand perspective is essential to improving the provision of these services in the future. In times of national crisis, services should be prepared to support clients via alternative means including telephone and online. Public facing messages about service availability should be carefully expressed to minimize misunderstandings. ABSTRACT: Introduction National lockdown caused disruption to health services and third-sector organizations offering support to people who self-harm. Early reports suggested self-harm-related hospital attendances declined. Lack of knowledge related to the availability and accessibility of support provisions for people who self-harm warrants exploration into how they experienced help-seeking during lockdown. Aims This study aimed to explore the experiences of people who self-harm and perspectives on help-seeking. Method We conducted a qualitative study based on telephone and email interviews with 14 people who self-harm in England. Results Participants identified challenges to coping with life in lockdown, emphasizing the role of self-harm. Help-seeking was impeded by feeling like a burden and potential for spreading the virus. People who self-harm exercised self-reliance in response to "stay home" messaging, but some may have struggled without formal support. Online support served an important role in continuity of care during lockdown but could widen inequalities from limited resources and access. Implications for practice Helping mental health liaison nurses to understand the experiences of people who self-harm during lockdown is critical to providing continuing support to this population. Services should consider how and when they communicate changes to their provisions to the public, and the impact this will have on those in need of support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Self-Injurious Behavior , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Pandemics , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
18.
BMC Psychol ; 10(1): 87, 2022 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1775351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sudden outbreak of COVID-19 had a great impact on the physical and mental health of people all over the world, especially for students whose physical and mental development was not yet mature. In order to understand the physical and mental conditions of students during the epidemic period and provide a theoretical basis for coping with psychological problems in public health emergencies, this study explored the mediating role of sleep disorders in the effect of the psychological stress response (PSR) on non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), along with the moderating role of emotional management ability (EMA). METHODS: The SRQ-20, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, NSSI Behavior Questionnaire, and Emotional Management Questionnaire were used to investigate the mental health of Chinese students in April 10-20 (Time point 1, T1) and May 20-30 (Time point 2, T2), 2020. A total of 1,955 students (Mage = 19.64 years, 51.4% male) were examined at T1 and 342 students (Mage = 20.06 years, 48.2% male) were reassessed at T2. RESULTS: Overall, the detection rate of PSR and NSSI were 17.60% (n = 344) and 24.90% (n = 486) respectively in the T1 sample, and were 16.37% (n = 56) and 25.44% (n = 87), in the T2 sample. We also found that sleep disorders played a mediating role in the effect of PSR on NSSI in the T1 and T2 samples. In addition, EMA was shown to regulate the effect of PSR on sleep disorders and the effect of sleep disorders on NSSI in the T1 samples. CONCLUSION: We found that PSR resulting from public health emergency might lead to NSSI behaviors in individuals. PSR may also cause sleep disorders, which can bring about NSSI. However, these effects were also moderated by the EMA. This research expands our understanding of PSR and NSSI in students during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Sleep Wake Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/etiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Students/psychology
19.
Cien Saude Colet ; 25(suppl 1): 2479-2486, 2020 Jun.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1725052

ABSTRACT

This essay aimed to discuss the implications of social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic for the intensive use of the internet among children and adolescents and its possible consequences for the practice of self-inflicted violence. We briefly discussed the anxiogenic potential and the reproduction of a "global fear" that are consolidated with the massive and unmediated exposure of the content consumed, which can increase the vulnerabilities to stress and suicidal ideas. We centered our debate on "recreational" practices, called "challenges" with self-harm power, carried out by teenagers on the YouTube website. This practice has been shown to increase with the social isolation measures. Our reflection on these risks builds on the theoretical perspective of digital sociability, and its implications for the internet-mediated interactions of adolescents.


O presente ensaio busca discutir as implicações do isolamento social devido à pandemia do COVID-19 para o uso intensivo da internet entre crianças e adolescentes e suas possíveis consequências para a prática de violências autoinflingidas. Discutimos brevemente o potencial ansiogênico e a reprodução de um "medo global" que se consolidam com a exposição maciça e sem mediação dos conteúdos consumidos, que podem aumentar as vulnerabilidades para estresse e ideações suicidas. Centramos nosso debate sobre práticas "recreativas", denominadas de "desafios" com poder autolesivo, realizados por adolescentes no site Youtube. Essa prática revelou-se crescente a partir das medidas de isolamento social. Nossa reflexão sobre esses riscos é feita a partir da perspectiva teórica da sociabilidade digital, e suas implicações nas interações de adolescentes mediadas pela internet.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Social Isolation/psychology , Adolescent , Anxiety/psychology , Behavior, Addictive , COVID-19 , Child , Fear , Humans , Information Storage and Retrieval/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Concept , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Time Factors
20.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e052613, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1685588

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A substantial reduction in self-harm recorded in primary care occurred during the first wave of COVID-19 but effects on primary care management of self-harm are unknown. Our objectives were to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical management within 3 months of an episode of self-harm. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: UK primary care. PARTICIPANTS: 4238 patients with an index episode of self-harm recorded in UK primary care during the COVID-19 first-wave period (10 March 2020-10 June 2020) compared with 48 739 patients in a prepandemic comparison period (10 March-10 June, 2010-2019). OUTCOME MEASURES: Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we compared cohorts of patients with an index self-harm episode recorded during the prepandemic period versus the COVID-19 first-wave period. Patients were followed up for 3 months to capture subsequent general practitioner (GP)/practice nurse consultation, referral to mental health services and psychotropic medication prescribing. We examined differences by gender, age group and Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile. RESULTS: Likelihood of having at least one GP/practice nurse consultation was broadly similar (83.2% vs 80.3% in the COVID-19 cohort). The proportion of patients referred to mental health services in the COVID-19 cohort (4.2%) was around two-thirds of that in the prepandemic cohort (6.1%). Similar proportions were prescribed psychotropic medication within 3 months in the prepandemic (54.0%) and COVID-19 first-wave (54.9%) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges experienced by primary healthcare teams during the initial COVID-19 wave, prescribing and consultation patterns following self-harm were broadly similar to prepandemic levels. We found no evidence of widening of digital exclusion in terms of access to remote consultations. However, the reduced likelihood of referral to mental health services warrants attention. Accessible outpatient and community services for people who have self-harmed are required as the COVID-19 crisis recedes and the population faces new challenges to mental health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Self-Injurious Behavior , Cohort Studies , Humans , Primary Health Care , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL